Sign in
Edition of 20:00 CETMonday, August 3, 2026
320 outlets · 17 languages267 briefings today
TechnologyFriday, July 3, 2026

Alibaba bans Claude Code after hidden tracking code discovered

The Chinese tech giant will prohibit employee use of the Anthropic coding tool from July 10, citing security risks after researchers found embedded surveillance mechanisms.

Alibaba Group will bar employees from using Anthropic’s Claude Code in the workplace starting 10 July, after security researchers discovered that the tool contained hidden code capable of identifying users linked to China. The Chinese e-commerce and cloud company added Claude Code to an internal list of high-risk software with security vulnerabilities, according to an internal notice seen by the South China Morning Post, and is directing staff to use its own Qoder platform instead. The move marks a sharp escalation in the operational friction between US and Chinese artificial-intelligence firms.

Security researchers who reverse-engineered recent versions of Claude Code found that the software inspected proxy configurations and time-zone settings, and inserted imperceptible markers into system prompts that could signal whether a user was in China or affiliated with a Chinese AI laboratory. Much of the logic was obfuscated in the binary, and the release notes made no mention of the mechanism. An Anthropic employee acknowledged on social media that the feature was an experiment launched in March, intended to detect unauthorised account resale and protect against model distillation. The company said it would remove the check in the next release.

The ban follows a separate accusation by Anthropic that Alibaba’s Qwen lab operated nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to scrape Claude outputs—a distillation effort that Anthropic described in a letter to US senators. Viewed from Beijing, the hidden-code discovery has reinforced concerns about data security and prompted Alibaba to treat Claude Code as a backdoor risk. Other large Chinese firms, including Ant Financial and ByteDance, have previously used workarounds such as Singapore-based corporate accounts and VPN-reimbursed personal subscriptions to access Claude, practices that contravene Anthropic’s terms of service but do not violate US or Chinese law.

Washington’s own posture has oscillated. In mid-June the US government imposed emergency export controls on Anthropic’s latest Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models after researchers demonstrated a cybersecurity-safeguard bypass; the restrictions were lifted on 30 June after Anthropic built a new classifier that redirects sensitive prompts to an older model. The episode has not halted the broader shift: Chinese models such as Z.ai’s GLM-5.2 are gaining developer traction on platforms like OpenRouter, and some US technology figures note that open-weight Chinese systems are closing the capability gap at a fraction of the cost. The next concrete marker is the 10 July entry-into-force of Alibaba’s ban, alongside Anthropic’s promised removal of the tracking code, which will test whether the two sides can contain the dispute to commercial terms or whether it widens into a broader decoupling of AI toolchains.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Sovranità tecnologica vs. Cooperazione globale
40%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.30 to +0.60
Critici verso la mossaCelebrativi della mossa
RUSCINATL
Divergence between press blocs
Russian & CIS press−0.20neutral
Chinese press+0.60aligned
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.30critical
Russian & CIS press−0.20
Voice

Russia re-projects Alibaba's move as evidence of the need for a multipolar order in AI.

Mechanismescalation simmetrica

The Russian narrative equates Alibaba's restrictions with a threat to sovereignty, using national security language to justify a position of strength.

Omission

It omits that Alibaba acted in response to US pressure, presenting the move as autonomous.

AlarmRevanchism
Chinese press+0.60
Voice

China celebrates Alibaba's decision as a step toward technological independence, dismissing Western criticism.

Mechanismtrionfo tecnologico

It uses the success of other Chinese technologies (desalination) to create a context of continuous progress, downplaying difficulties.

Omission

It omits concerns about dependence on foreign suppliers and potential economic repercussions.

TriumphPragmatism
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.30
Voice

The West analyzes Alibaba's move as a case study in tech competition, emphasizing risks to cooperation.

Mechanismgiudizializzazione

It adopts a detached, analytical tone, citing experts and data to assess impact without openly taking sides.

Omission

It omits Alibaba's national security motivations, focusing on consequences for the global market.

SkepticismAlarm
Breaking
US State Department Plans to Shutter Five Diplomatic Missions Abroad·Netflix's 'Elize: Sombras de una mujer' revisits a Brazilian murder that gripped a nation·Trump Rejects Iran Link to Water System Hacks, Blames Minnesota·Mexico completes perfect triathlon sweep with mixed relay gold in Santo Domingo·Ghana cuts diesel price by GH¢2 per litre to head off transport fare protests·AI now powers 55% of African cybercrime as losses double to $484m, Interpol finds·Primates show pet-like care for other species, 427-case study finds·Americas Brace for Widespread Storms, Flooding and Extreme Heat on 3 August·US State Department Plans to Shutter Five Diplomatic Missions Abroad·Netflix's 'Elize: Sombras de una mujer' revisits a Brazilian murder that gripped a nation·Trump Rejects Iran Link to Water System Hacks, Blames Minnesota·Mexico completes perfect triathlon sweep with mixed relay gold in Santo Domingo·Ghana cuts diesel price by GH¢2 per litre to head off transport fare protests·AI now powers 55% of African cybercrime as losses double to $484m, Interpol finds·Primates show pet-like care for other species, 427-case study finds·Americas Brace for Widespread Storms, Flooding and Extreme Heat on 3 August·
Upd. 02:52 PM6 languages · 12 outlets
12 outlets|6 languages|3 min read
Friday, July 3, 2026

Alibaba bans Claude Code after hidden tracking code discovered

The Chinese tech giant will prohibit employee use of the Anthropic coding tool from July 10, citing security risks after researchers found embedded surveillance mechanisms.

Alibaba Group will bar employees from using Anthropic’s Claude Code in the workplace starting 10 July, after security researchers discovered that the tool contained hidden code capable of identifying users linked to China. The Chinese e-commerce and cloud company added Claude Code to an internal list of high-risk software with security vulnerabilities, according to an internal notice seen by the South China Morning Post, and is directing staff to use its own Qoder platform instead. The move marks a sharp escalation in the operational friction between US and Chinese artificial-intelligence firms.

Security researchers who reverse-engineered recent versions of Claude Code found that the software inspected proxy configurations and time-zone settings, and inserted imperceptible markers into system prompts that could signal whether a user was in China or affiliated with a Chinese AI laboratory. Much of the logic was obfuscated in the binary, and the release notes made no mention of the mechanism. An Anthropic employee acknowledged on social media that the feature was an experiment launched in March, intended to detect unauthorised account resale and protect against model distillation. The company said it would remove the check in the next release.

The ban follows a separate accusation by Anthropic that Alibaba’s Qwen lab operated nearly 25,000 fraudulent accounts to scrape Claude outputs—a distillation effort that Anthropic described in a letter to US senators. Viewed from Beijing, the hidden-code discovery has reinforced concerns about data security and prompted Alibaba to treat Claude Code as a backdoor risk. Other large Chinese firms, including Ant Financial and ByteDance, have previously used workarounds such as Singapore-based corporate accounts and VPN-reimbursed personal subscriptions to access Claude, practices that contravene Anthropic’s terms of service but do not violate US or Chinese law.

Washington’s own posture has oscillated. In mid-June the US government imposed emergency export controls on Anthropic’s latest Fable 5 and Mythos 5 models after researchers demonstrated a cybersecurity-safeguard bypass; the restrictions were lifted on 30 June after Anthropic built a new classifier that redirects sensitive prompts to an older model. The episode has not halted the broader shift: Chinese models such as Z.ai’s GLM-5.2 are gaining developer traction on platforms like OpenRouter, and some US technology figures note that open-weight Chinese systems are closing the capability gap at a fraction of the cost. The next concrete marker is the 10 July entry-into-force of Alibaba’s ban, alongside Anthropic’s promised removal of the tracking code, which will test whether the two sides can contain the dispute to commercial terms or whether it widens into a broader decoupling of AI toolchains.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Sovranità tecnologica vs. Cooperazione globale
40%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.30 to +0.60
Critici verso la mossaCelebrativi della mossa
RUSCINATL
Divergence between press blocs
Russian & CIS press−0.20neutral
Chinese press+0.60aligned
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.30critical
Russian & CIS press−0.20
Voice

Russia re-projects Alibaba's move as evidence of the need for a multipolar order in AI.

Mechanismescalation simmetrica

The Russian narrative equates Alibaba's restrictions with a threat to sovereignty, using national security language to justify a position of strength.

Omission

It omits that Alibaba acted in response to US pressure, presenting the move as autonomous.

AlarmRevanchism
Chinese press+0.60
Voice

China celebrates Alibaba's decision as a step toward technological independence, dismissing Western criticism.

Mechanismtrionfo tecnologico

It uses the success of other Chinese technologies (desalination) to create a context of continuous progress, downplaying difficulties.

Omission

It omits concerns about dependence on foreign suppliers and potential economic repercussions.

TriumphPragmatism
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.30
Voice

The West analyzes Alibaba's move as a case study in tech competition, emphasizing risks to cooperation.

Mechanismgiudizializzazione

It adopts a detached, analytical tone, citing experts and data to assess impact without openly taking sides.

Omission

It omits Alibaba's national security motivations, focusing on consequences for the global market.

SkepticismAlarm

This story appeared in

12 outlets · 6 languages

Broaden your view

From Geopolitics & Politics

Trump Suspends Planned Iran Strikes, Citing Outline of Deal on Hormuz and Nuclear Programme

2 languages · 74 outlets

From Economy & Markets

Amazon market value surpasses $3 trillion for first time on AI-fuelled cloud surge

6 languages · 11 outlets

From Science & Health

Time-restricted eating improves problem-solving in overweight older women, trial finds

4 languages · 10 outlets

Read more