
Oil Prices Slide to Pre-War Lows as Hormuz Flows Resume, but Iranian Threat Clouds Outlook
Crude benchmarks hit levels last seen before the February conflict, yet a fresh warning from Tehran and divided analyst forecasts underscore the fragility of the détente.
Brent crude fell for a third straight session on Thursday, dipping below $71 a barrel to its lowest since late February, as the Strait of Hormuz reopened to significant tanker traffic following indirect US-Iran talks in Doha. The Qatari foreign ministry reported “positive progress” on the memorandum of understanding that halted the war in mid-June, and ship-tracking data showed four supertankers carrying some 8 million barrels of Saudi crude exiting the strait in a single day—the largest such movement since the ceasefire. The immediate effect was a return to price levels not seen since before the conflict erupted on 28 February, with Brent settling around $71.80 and West Texas Intermediate near $68.70.
The recovery in flows, however, remains incomplete and politically fragile. Overall transit through the waterway has rebounded to more than 10 million barrels per day, according to a US official cited by Bloomberg, but that is still well below the pre-war average of 18–19 million bpd. Gulf producers are ramping up: Kuwait’s output surged to 1.65 million bpd in June from 580,000 bpd in May, while the UAE exported over 3.9 million bpd, its highest rate since 2017. Yet on Thursday, Iran’s joint military command threatened an “immediate and forceful response” against any vessel deviating from approved routes, a reminder that the security framework governing the strait rests on a temporary memorandum, not a permanent settlement. The next round of talks will not convene until after the funeral of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei on 9 July.
Analysts in major financial centres are split on the trajectory. Investment banks have slashed forecasts: UBS cut its third-quarter Brent estimate by $25 to $80 a barrel, and Citi now sees prices falling to $65 in 2027, citing a steady restoration of supply led by Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Iran and Russia. By contrast, some Gulf-based market specialists argue that current prices are unsustainably low. Kuwaiti expert Mohammed al-Shatti told An-Nahar that the market is “much lower than it should be,” pointing to the risk of a geopolitical escalation that could stall or reverse the diplomatic process. This divergence is compounded by the upcoming OPEC+ meeting on Sunday, where producers are expected to agree on a further output increase from August, adding a supply-side weight to prices even as demand recovers slowly.
The immediate milestones are the OPEC+ decision this weekend and the resumption of US-Iran negotiations after the Khamenei funeral. While the Doha channel has delivered a fragile calm, the Iranian military’s latest warning and the absence of a nuclear accord mean the risk of renewed disruption remains priced into the market’s cautious optimism.
| Arab Levant-Maghreb press | −0.30 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Latin American press | +0.40 | aligned |
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | +0.60 | aligned |
Gli stati arabi del Golfo mettono in guardia: l’accordo USA-Iran è una minaccia per la loro sicurezza, non una vittoria per la pace.
Si costruisce una gerarchia di minacce in cui l’accordo viene presentato come un pericolo per la stabilità regionale, superiore ai benefici economici immediati.
Viene omesso il potenziale impatto positivo della riduzione dei prezzi del petrolio sui consumatori globali e sulle economie importatrici.
Le economie latinoamericane accolgono il calo del petrolio come un sollievo per le loro bilance commerciali, senza schierarsi politicamente.
Si adotta un approccio pragmatico che riduce la complessità geopolitica a un semplice calcolo di costi-benefici, ignorando le implicazioni strategiche.
Viene omesso il ruolo dell’Iran come attore regionale e le possibili conseguenze per la stabilità del Medio Oriente.
Gli Stati Uniti riaffermano la propria leadership: il calo del petrolio dimostra che la loro diplomazia ha prevalso, portando stabilità globale.
Si personifica lo stato americano come attore razionale e benevolo, attribuendo il successo esclusivamente alla sua iniziativa, mentre si minimizza il ruolo dell’Iran o delle forze di mercato.
Viene omesso il punto di vista iraniano e la possibilità che il calo dei prezzi sia dovuto anche a fattori economici indipendenti dai negoziati.
Broaden your view
US Senate votes 86-11 to advance Russia sanctions bill authorising 100% tariffs on top energy buyers
2 languages · 40 outlets
From TechnologyRussian ministry proposes SMS ban for children’s SIM cards, risking social media access
1 language · 13 outlets
From Science & HealthHunter Biden says father Joe Biden's prostate cancer has spread further, causing severe pain
6 languages · 54 outlets