Sign in
Edition of 20:00 CETTuesday, August 4, 2026
320 outlets · 17 languages315 briefings today
Media & EntertainmentTuesday, August 4, 2026

Snogging teens in Munich and a $69.99 horse: Nolan's 'Odyssey' ignites a culture war

From a Munich cinema to the pages of the London Review of Books, Christopher Nolan's take on Homer has provoked academics, columnists and popcorn vendors alike.

In a Munich multiplex, teenagers kiss in the dark, apparently oblivious that the giant screen is showing a nearly 3,000-year-old epic, a Süddeutsche Zeitung columnist observed. The scene captures the strange fate of Christopher Nolan’s *Odyssey*: a blockbuster that has become a Rorschach test for contemporary cultural battles, even as many viewers simply show up for the spectacle.

Nolan’s film adapts the Homeric poem with a heavily altered screenplay that, according to the classicist Emily Wilson, largely erases the Greek gods and Odysseus’ wit, lust and contradictions. Wilson, whose 2017 translation partly inspired the film, published an incendiary essay in the London Review of Books criticising the adaptation. The novelist Joyce Carol Oates retaliated on social media, likening Wilson’s tone to “the crude language of MAGA folks.” Wilson’s translation is now the number-two bestselling book in the country, and the film is marching toward a billion-dollar box office.

American columnist Ross Douthat, writing for a Brazilian publication, called the film “bland, insipid and shallow” yet noted that its very blandness makes it perfectly calibrated for ideological appropriation. The movie can be read as an allegory of liberal international order, a Christian morality tale, or a populist story of a warrior returning to find guests abusing hospitality, he argued. Meanwhile, the Trojan horse prop at the centre of the film — a 40-foot, rearing wooden beast — has been reproduced as a $69.99 plastic popcorn bucket, a transformation that *The Atlantic* called a “joke,” given that the original horse’s trick would be ruined if it had windows.

In Berlin, the columnist Harald Martenstein took aim at Nolan’s casting of black actors as Greeks, noting that black Greeks were about as common in antiquity as electric-vehicle charging stations. He suggested the film missed an opportunity to depict the actual sexual diversity of ancient Greece — “was the Trojan horse in truth a darkroom?” — but conceded that such choices would risk age-rating problems. The debate, like the snogging teenagers in Munich, suggests that Homer’s story, however altered, still has the power to draw audiences and arguments into its orbit.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Autenticità storica vs. Reinterpretazione artistica
43%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.70 to +0.30
Critici dell'aggiornamento wokeDifensori della reinterpretazione artistica
EURATLLAT
Divergence between press blocs
Continental European press−0.70critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press+0.30aligned
Latin American press−0.50critical
Nolan and his film have no direct voice in this cluster of outlets.
Continental European press−0.70
Voice

German critics expose the woke falsification of the ancient epic, mocking the inclusion of black actors in ancient Greece and the loss of erotic content.

Mechanismanacronismo polemico

It uses anachronisms (black Greeks, electric car charging stations, women's officers) as seemingly absurd evidence to argue that the film imposes modern ideology onto the past, appealing to common sense notions of historical plausibility.

Omission

It omits historiographic evidence of diversity in the ancient Mediterranean and the fact that reinterpretation is part of a long tradition of epic adaptations.

OutrageIronySkepticism
Atlantic / Anglosphere press+0.30
Voice

Progressive American critics claim the artist's right to freely reinterpret myth, rejecting accusations of anachronism as a narrow view of authenticity.

Mechanismuniversalizzazione

It universalises the principle of artistic reinterpretation by arguing that every adaptation updates cultural references, thereby normalising diversity choices as part of an established creative tradition.

Omission

It omits the debate about the film's commercial impact and its actual artistic quality beyond its cultural strategy.

PragmatismDetachment
Latin American press−0.50
Voice

Latin American critics diagnose the film as a symptom of the contemporary culture war, dismantling its claim to depth and reducing it to a consumer object.

Mechanismanalisi del sintomo culturale

It treats the film not as an autonomous work but as a mirror of social conflicts, using its own hyper-analytical reception as evidence of its empty significance.

Omission

It omits the possibility that the film might have aesthetic value independent of its cultural positioning.

SkepticismIrony
Breaking
Brazil Downgrades Argentina Ties to Chargé d’Affaires After Milei Insults Lula·UK Excludes Rapists and Child Sex Offenders from Early Release, Cuts Freed Prisoners to 5,000·UFC’s White House Event Yields $30m Loss Despite Record Viewership·Mohamed Salah on verge of Trabzonspor move as free agent after Liverpool exit·Mexico State’s Plate Renewal Brings Sticker-Coloured Deadlines and Debt Relief·Total solar eclipse to cross mainland Spain for first time in over a century on 12 August·Alonso confronts Chelsea’s 46-man squad as Mudryk returns and Henderson signs·FIFA Dismisses Reports of Infantino Seeking Trump’s Help as ‘Pure Fiction’·Brazil Downgrades Argentina Ties to Chargé d’Affaires After Milei Insults Lula·UK Excludes Rapists and Child Sex Offenders from Early Release, Cuts Freed Prisoners to 5,000·UFC’s White House Event Yields $30m Loss Despite Record Viewership·Mohamed Salah on verge of Trabzonspor move as free agent after Liverpool exit·Mexico State’s Plate Renewal Brings Sticker-Coloured Deadlines and Debt Relief·Total solar eclipse to cross mainland Spain for first time in over a century on 12 August·Alonso confronts Chelsea’s 46-man squad as Mudryk returns and Henderson signs·FIFA Dismisses Reports of Infantino Seeking Trump’s Help as ‘Pure Fiction’·
Upd. 09:26 PM4 languages · 6 outlets
PreviousMedia & EntertainmentNext
6 outlets|4 languages|2 min read
Tuesday, August 4, 2026

Snogging teens in Munich and a $69.99 horse: Nolan's 'Odyssey' ignites a culture war

From a Munich cinema to the pages of the London Review of Books, Christopher Nolan's take on Homer has provoked academics, columnists and popcorn vendors alike.

In a Munich multiplex, teenagers kiss in the dark, apparently oblivious that the giant screen is showing a nearly 3,000-year-old epic, a Süddeutsche Zeitung columnist observed. The scene captures the strange fate of Christopher Nolan’s *Odyssey*: a blockbuster that has become a Rorschach test for contemporary cultural battles, even as many viewers simply show up for the spectacle.

Nolan’s film adapts the Homeric poem with a heavily altered screenplay that, according to the classicist Emily Wilson, largely erases the Greek gods and Odysseus’ wit, lust and contradictions. Wilson, whose 2017 translation partly inspired the film, published an incendiary essay in the London Review of Books criticising the adaptation. The novelist Joyce Carol Oates retaliated on social media, likening Wilson’s tone to “the crude language of MAGA folks.” Wilson’s translation is now the number-two bestselling book in the country, and the film is marching toward a billion-dollar box office.

American columnist Ross Douthat, writing for a Brazilian publication, called the film “bland, insipid and shallow” yet noted that its very blandness makes it perfectly calibrated for ideological appropriation. The movie can be read as an allegory of liberal international order, a Christian morality tale, or a populist story of a warrior returning to find guests abusing hospitality, he argued. Meanwhile, the Trojan horse prop at the centre of the film — a 40-foot, rearing wooden beast — has been reproduced as a $69.99 plastic popcorn bucket, a transformation that *The Atlantic* called a “joke,” given that the original horse’s trick would be ruined if it had windows.

In Berlin, the columnist Harald Martenstein took aim at Nolan’s casting of black actors as Greeks, noting that black Greeks were about as common in antiquity as electric-vehicle charging stations. He suggested the film missed an opportunity to depict the actual sexual diversity of ancient Greece — “was the Trojan horse in truth a darkroom?” — but conceded that such choices would risk age-rating problems. The debate, like the snogging teenagers in Munich, suggests that Homer’s story, however altered, still has the power to draw audiences and arguments into its orbit.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Autenticità storica vs. Reinterpretazione artistica
43%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.70 to +0.30
Critici dell'aggiornamento wokeDifensori della reinterpretazione artistica
EURATLLAT
Divergence between press blocs
Continental European press−0.70critical
Atlantic / Anglosphere press+0.30aligned
Latin American press−0.50critical
Nolan and his film have no direct voice in this cluster of outlets.
Continental European press−0.70
Voice

German critics expose the woke falsification of the ancient epic, mocking the inclusion of black actors in ancient Greece and the loss of erotic content.

Mechanismanacronismo polemico

It uses anachronisms (black Greeks, electric car charging stations, women's officers) as seemingly absurd evidence to argue that the film imposes modern ideology onto the past, appealing to common sense notions of historical plausibility.

Omission

It omits historiographic evidence of diversity in the ancient Mediterranean and the fact that reinterpretation is part of a long tradition of epic adaptations.

OutrageIronySkepticism
Atlantic / Anglosphere press+0.30
Voice

Progressive American critics claim the artist's right to freely reinterpret myth, rejecting accusations of anachronism as a narrow view of authenticity.

Mechanismuniversalizzazione

It universalises the principle of artistic reinterpretation by arguing that every adaptation updates cultural references, thereby normalising diversity choices as part of an established creative tradition.

Omission

It omits the debate about the film's commercial impact and its actual artistic quality beyond its cultural strategy.

PragmatismDetachment
Latin American press−0.50
Voice

Latin American critics diagnose the film as a symptom of the contemporary culture war, dismantling its claim to depth and reducing it to a consumer object.

Mechanismanalisi del sintomo culturale

It treats the film not as an autonomous work but as a mirror of social conflicts, using its own hyper-analytical reception as evidence of its empty significance.

Omission

It omits the possibility that the film might have aesthetic value independent of its cultural positioning.

SkepticismIrony

This story appeared in

6 outlets · 4 languages

Broaden your view

From Geopolitics & Politics

Trump Suspends Planned Iran Strikes, Citing Outline of Deal on Hormuz and Nuclear Programme

2 languages · 74 outlets

From Economy & Markets

Oil majors post bumper Q2 profits as Iran conflict drives price surge

8 languages · 21 outlets

From Technology

Falcon 9 upper stage to strike Moon on 5 August, offering rare scientific opportunity

3 languages · 8 outlets

Read more