FIFA faces revolt as senior adviser quits over World Cup investment plan
Carlos Cordeiro resigns in protest as UEFA, CONCACAF and AFC unite against Gianni Infantino's proposal to sell a stake in the World Cup to private investors.
Carlos Cordeiro, a senior adviser to FIFA president Gianni Infantino, resigned with immediate effect on Friday, calling the proposed sale of a stake in the World Cup a “bad deal for football”. In a statement, Cordeiro said he had no involvement in the plan and opposed it unequivocally, adding that FIFA was “mortgaging football’s future without any convincing justification”. Cordeiro, a former banker and ex-vice-president of the US Soccer Federation, was appointed by Infantino in 2021 to help shape FIFA’s future.
The resignation came as opposition to the plan hardened across three continents. On Thursday, UEFA’s 55 member associations voted unanimously to boycott all FIFA competitions, including the men’s and women’s World Cups, unless the proposal is abandoned in its entirety and binding assurances given that FIFA will never again open its governance or tournaments to private ownership. CONCACAF, representing 41 nations in North and Central America and the Caribbean, rejected the proposal after an emergency meeting, though it stopped short of a boycott threat. The Asian Football Confederation (AFC), with 47 member associations, declared its solidarity with UEFA and CONCACAF, warning that the plan could not “realistically achieve the necessary broad consensus and unity required to move forward”. The three confederations together represent 143 of FIFA’s 211 member associations, making it highly unlikely that Infantino can secure the simple majority of 106 votes needed for approval.
At the centre of the dispute is FIFA’s plan to create a commercial subsidiary, the FIFA Forward Enterprise (FFE), valued at $20 billion, which would manage the World Cup and other events. FIFA would sell up to a 20% minority stake to external investors, with a consortium led by Thrive Capital, the firm founded by Joshua Kushner, brother of Jared Kushner, expected to be the lead investor. Infantino has offered each of the 211 member associations a one-off payment of $20 million and increased development funding if they back the plan by a 19 September deadline. FIFA responded on Friday by insisting that “nobody is selling football” and vowing to press ahead with an “open and democratic” consultation, blaming “incorrect media reports” for disrupting the process. The AFC, however, said that “the main concerns regarding governance, institutional process and meaningful consultation remain unanswered” and called for an urgent review of FIFA’s decision-making framework.
| Continental European press | −0.90 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Atlantic / Anglosphere press | −0.70 | critical |
| Latin American press | −0.40 | critical |
UEFA and its 55 member associations speak with one voice: the World Cup is not for sale, and we will boycott every FIFA competition until this proposal is withdrawn. We are the guardians of the game, and we will not allow private investors to take control.
The bloc universalizes its position by framing the boycott as a moral imperative to protect football's soul, using unanimous vote to demonstrate absolute unity and legitimacy.
The bloc omits any discussion of the potential financial benefits for smaller federations that FIFA's plan might bring, focusing solely on the threat to the sport's integrity.
The Atlantic press reports that European teams have dropped a nuclear bomb on Infantino's plan, with the Kushner-backed deal now in peril. The World Cup is at risk of being torn apart by a political and financial scandal.
The bloc uses dramatic language and personalization (Kushner, Trump) to turn a governance dispute into a political scandal, heightening the sense of crisis and urgency.
The bloc omits the detailed legal and governance arguments made by UEFA and CONCACAF about due process and lack of consultation, focusing instead on the political connections.
CONCACAF and its 41 associations reject the proposal due to lack of due process, but Mexico's FMF says it is open to analyzing everything, signaling a possible division in the region.
The bloc uses a contrastive narrative to highlight internal disagreement, presenting the Mexican stance as a pragmatic outlier while still reporting the official rejection.
The bloc omits the strong moral language used by UEFA and the political scandal angle, focusing instead on procedural concerns and regional dynamics.
Broaden your view
US revokes visa of Brazil’s ambassador in retaliation over envoy approval delay
3 languages · 43 outlets
From Economy & MarketsSpaceX revenue jumps 92% in first post-IPO quarter, but AI spending triggers share slide
1 language · 31 outlets
From TechnologyBoeing 737 MAX 7 wins FAA certification after near-decade of scrutiny
3 languages · 18 outlets