
白宫急召军工与汽车巨头会商增产导弹,应对伊朗战事消耗
特朗普政府推动汽车厂转产武器并考虑海外授权生产,以补充因对伊朗军事行动而锐减的弹药库存。
美国总统特朗普确认,白宫将于本周三召集国防承包商及汽车制造商高管,商讨加速导弹与弹药生产。此次会议背景是,美国在对伊朗近四个月的军事行动中消耗了大量精确制导弹药。据美国媒体报道,仅在前七周,美军就使用了近半数的“爱国者”导弹库存和约30%的“战斧”巡航导弹。特朗普表示,通用汽车、福特等车企拥有闲置产能,正就转产“爱国者”和“战斧”等武器达成协议。
从美国行政部门的立场看,此次动员旨在通过《国防生产法》赋予的权力,快速补充库存并实现国防工业基础的多样化。白宫发言人凯利称,美军现有弹药“绰绰有余”,但政府希望确保“始终拥有大量储备”。五角大楼已与洛克希德·马丁、RTX等企业达成初步增产协议,但国会尚未批准相关拨款。特朗普政府已提议将2027财年国防预算增至1.5万亿美元,同比增幅达42%,其中529亿美元专门用于扩大12种关键弹药的产能。与此同时,美国国防工业界反应不一:通用汽车据报“非常热衷”,但福特等车企此前曾公开表示,将汽车生产线转为军工生产面临成本高昂和工期漫长等挑战,且特朗普政府的关税政策带来的不确定性也影响其投资决策。
这一动向在全球范围内引发不同解读。欧洲方面,有消息称华盛顿正考虑在欧授权生产美制导弹,以缩短供应链并分担产能压力。在亚洲,观察人士指出,美国大幅扩产精确打击武器,与其在“印太地区”强化对华军事威慑的长期战略相吻合。部分亚洲政策圈层担心,此举可能刺激地区军备竞赛,迫使相关国家重新评估自身防御能力与工业动员模式。此外,五角大楼还计划增加对无人机及反无人机系统的投入,并明确提及从“特别军事行动”中汲取教训,这进一步凸显其将欧洲与亚洲安全挑战联动应对的意图。
此次会议原定于6月中旬举行,但因美国与伊朗的谈判而推迟。目前,特朗普政府正寻求通过《国防生产法》下的“自愿协议与行动计划”来绕过部分常规采购流程。下一步,国会能否通过创纪录的国防预算,以及汽车制造商与军工企业能否在具体转产方案上达成一致,将成为决定这一轮军工动员成效的关键。会议结果预计将在本周内公布。
| 伊朗及相关媒体 | −0.20 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| 大西洋/英语圈媒体 | −0.30 | critical |
| 俄罗斯及独联体媒体 | 0.00 | neutral |
Iran rejects US pressure and asserts its role in negotiations.
It uses the technique of 'normalization' of tensions, presenting disputes as part of an ordinary diplomatic process, and omits military threats to reinforce an image of stability.
It omits the fact that the United States is mobilizing its defense industry for a conflict, a detail that would contradict the narrative of détente.
The international community must watch the Iranian regime, which uses negotiations to buy time while repressing dissent.
It uses the 'dual track' technique, contrasting diplomatic promises with repressive facts to delegitimize the regime.
It omits the fact that the United States is preparing a large-scale rearmament, suggesting that diplomacy may be a cover for military action.
Russia looks elsewhere, busy facing its own internal threats and consolidating the economy.
It uses the 'strategic silence' technique, ignoring an event to underline its irrelevance compared to national priorities.
Any mention of the US mobilization is omitted, which could be seen as an indirect threat to Russia, but the Russian press chooses not to amplify it.