
伊朗议长驳斥美方资金用途说法,美伊协议执行面临信任考验
伊朗首席谈判代表卡利巴夫称不会用解冻资产购买美国农产品,美方则坚称资金将受控用于采购美国粮食,双方分歧凸显协议执行的不确定性。
伊朗议会主席、首席谈判代表穆罕默德·巴盖尔·卡利巴夫于6月25日公开驳斥美国关于解冻伊朗资产将用于购买美国农产品的说法。他在社交媒体X上以讽刺口吻写道:“美国谎称我们解冻的资产将用于购买他们的农产品。有趣。我们收获的唯一作物是你们多年前种下的:几十年的不信任。这种作物完全有机、产量丰富且是本土的。”卡利巴夫还称,美国“只出口转基因大豆、违背的承诺和毫无价值的空谈”。这一表态直接回应了美方高级官员近日的一系列声明。
美方立场由总统特朗普、副总统万斯和财政部长贝森特先后阐述。特朗普在6月24日表示,对伊朗的初步金融松绑将涉及约5亿美元,形式为美国商品而非现金,资金将用于支付美国农民出口的玉米、小麦等产品。他强调“伊朗急需粮食,我们将专门从美国为他们购买”。贝森特则对CNBC透露,首批解冻资金可能通过卡塔尔进行,美国财政部官员将驻多哈监督资金用途,确保“绝大部分”用于从美国购买食品和药品。美方叙事将解冻资产描绘为一种受控的人道主义安排,且最终回流至美国农业部门。
双方争执的核心在于对解冻资金控制权的不同解读。根据上周签署的14点谅解备忘录,美国承诺“完全允许使用与伊朗伊斯兰共和国相关的冻结或受限资金和资产”,并“终止对伊朗的所有类型制裁,包括联合国安理会决议”。该协议由巴基斯坦斡旋,于6月18日经伊朗总统佩泽什基安与特朗普电子签署后生效。伊朗方面强调,将自行决定资金用途,不受外部指令约束。卡利巴夫的言论不仅是对美方说法的否认,更意在向国内展示谈判并未让渡经济主权。
地区观察人士指出,美伊在资金使用上的公开分歧可能为协议后续执行埋下隐患。若双方无法就监督机制达成共识,解冻进程可能延迟,进而影响更广泛的制裁松绑。对亚洲而言,中东局势稳定直接关系到能源供应安全。中国作为伊朗石油的主要买家之一,且通过“一带一路”倡议与伊朗保持经济联系,对美伊关系走向保持关注。巴基斯坦的斡旋角色也凸显了南亚国家在地区外交中的活跃度。
目前,协议仍处于早期执行阶段。美方称首批资金将通过卡塔尔渠道释放,财政部监督团队即将到位。伊朗则未公布具体的资金使用计划,仅重申自主权。双方下一轮技术性磋商预计将围绕监督细则展开,而卡利巴夫的强硬表态可能预示着谈判不会一帆风顺。
| 伊朗及相关媒体 | −0.50 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| 阿拉伯海湾媒体 | +0.30 | aligned |
| 俄罗斯及独联体媒体 | 0.00 | neutral |
We reject the humiliating conditions imposed by Washington: the frozen funds are ours and no blackmail will make us bend. America once again shows its duplicity, talking of negotiations while preparing attacks.
It builds a narrative of moral resistance and legitimate defense, contrasting Iranian firmness with alleged US hypocrisy, without mentioning the reasons for the asset freeze.
No mention is made of the international sanctions that led to the freeze nor of the specific conditions set by Washington, such as verification of peaceful nuclear use.
The Iranian rejection undermines peace efforts; the United States, by reopening its embassy in Kuwait, demonstrates its commitment to Gulf security. It is time for Tehran to accept reasonable conditions.
It presents the US action as an act of responsibility and stability, while delegitimizing the Iranian rejection as irrational, without delving into Tehran's reasons.
No mention is made of the context of unilateral US sanctions nor of the fact that the funds rightfully belong to Iran under previous agreements.
The dispute over frozen assets is a symptom of the lack of dialogue between powers. Russia supports every state's right to its own resources and calls for negotiations without preconditions.
It adopts a mediator tone, avoiding taking sides and framing the issue within international law, which reinforces Russia's image as a responsible actor.
No reference is made to its own disputes with the West nor to the fact that Russia itself has faced similar asset freezes.