
特朗普在戴维营威胁继续打击伊朗,称其军力“几乎归零”
美国总统在7月31日的内阁会议上表示,对伊朗的攻击可能持续数周,同时指责德黑兰在谈判中“经常背信”,但又称仍有可能达成协议。
美国总统特朗普7月31日在戴维营召开的内阁会议上明确表示,美国将继续对伊朗实施军事打击,且行动可能持续数周。据多家国际媒体报道,特朗普在回应何时能恢复停火的问题时称:“我们只想赢。我们曾试图尽可能友善,但他们正在被摧毁。”他预测,伊朗“在某个时候会说‘我们再也受不了了’”,并强调“我们将非常猛烈地打击他们”。特朗普同时声称,经过五个月的战争,伊朗的空中和海上力量已被“摧毁”,其导弹与无人机生产能力“几乎被完全消灭”,军事能力“实际上已接近零点”。
在释放强硬信号的同时,特朗普对通过外交途径结束战争表现出矛盾态度。他一方面指责伊朗在谈判中“经常背信”,称对方会在离开会议室后公开歪曲讨论内容,并抱怨“他们所做的一切就是让我生气”;另一方面,当被问及是否仍可能与伊朗达成协议时,他又表示“我认为我们只是想赢……我们进展顺利”,并透露其特使维特科夫和库什纳、国务卿鲁比奥以及副总统万斯正在参与与德黑兰的最新接触。特朗普还重申,伊朗绝不能获得核武器,并称若《联合全面行动计划》继续有效,将导致以色列和中东大部分地区被摧毁。
特朗普发表上述言论之际,地区冲突正进一步外溢。伊朗方面宣称,为回应美国前一日的空袭,其已向科威特境内的艾哈迈德·贾比尔空军基地发射无人机,目标为美军资产。科威特国防部证实,其武装部队在领空内探测并击落了多架无人机,袭击造成碎片坠落带来的物质损失,但无人员伤亡。此外,美国与沙特阿拉伯联合对伊拉克境内亲伊朗民兵发动了打击,导致至少20名战斗人员死亡;约旦武装部队拦截了五枚导弹;埃及一处港口终端发生爆炸,导致两艘船只起火,其中包括一艘美国天然气储存船,埃及政府确认爆炸由无人机袭击引发。
在国内层面,美国媒体本周报道称,明尼苏达州数十个供水系统遭到协同网络攻击,情报部门怀疑伊朗黑客是幕后黑手。特朗普在戴维营对此予以否认,称不相信伊朗参与其中,并将责任归咎于该州民主党籍州长沃尔兹的“无能”。尽管当天美国军方未报告对伊朗的新打击,但特朗普的言论表明,华盛顿短期内无意降低军事压力,而德黑兰则以针对美国地区盟友和资产的行动作为回应,双方立场依然尖锐对立。
| 欧洲大陆媒体 | 0.00 | neutral |
|---|---|---|
| 俄罗斯及独联体媒体 | −0.20 | neutral |
| 大西洋/英语圈媒体 | −0.40 | critical |
| 拉丁美洲媒体 | −0.30 | critical |
Continental Europe registers the escalation without taking sides, reducing Trumpian rhetoric to an element of the flow of war events.
Neutrality is achieved through the accumulation of heterogeneous facts (alliances, warnings) that dilute the centrality of Trump's statement.
It omits Trump's phrase 'we just want to win', used in other clusters to emphasize US determination.
Russia projects Trump's statements as proof of American imperialism, balancing the threat with the hypothesis of a deal to question its credibility.
The 'double track' technique presents both war and diplomacy as part of the American strategy, implying both are feigned.
Omits the expected duration of attacks (weeks) and regional alliances, focusing solely on Trump's words.
The Anglosphere denounces Trump's intransigence and the risk of an endless conflict, positioning itself as an alert voice for the international community.
The construction of a weekly horizon of attacks and the direct quote of 'we want to win' create a sense of urgency and implicit criticism.
It does not mention Iranian warnings to Bulgaria and Cyprus nor the Saudi alliance, narrowing the focus on the US position.
Brazil criticizes Trump's bellicose attitude, highlighting his accusation of Iranian unreliability as a pretext to continue hostilities.
The emphasis on the accusation of 'breaking one's word' serves to delegitimize US reasons, suggesting a war based on unilateral perceptions.
It does not report the 'we want to win' phrase nor the expected duration of attacks, focusing on the threat and accusation.