贝鲁特港口爆炸六周年：司法程序现进展，起诉决定预计数月内出台
在贝鲁特港口大爆炸六周年之际，遇难者家属与官员再次呼吁问责，而司法程序在经历多年政治干预后出现进展，起诉决定有望在数月内出台。
2026年8月4日，黎巴嫩举行活动纪念贝鲁特港口大爆炸六周年。这起发生于2020年8月4日的爆炸造成超过200人死亡、数千人受伤，起因被认定为港口仓库内长期不当存放的大量硝酸铵。周年当日，遇难者家属、政府官员及各界人士通过游行和仪式重申对真相与问责的要求。据法新社和路透社报道，调查法官塔雷克·比塔尔已完成对约70名被告的侦查，并将案件移交至公诉机关，等待其出具法律意见。
黎巴嫩司法部长阿德尔·纳萨尔在纪念现场对法新社表示，公诉机关预计在60至90天内完成意见书，随后比塔尔将发布起诉决定，从而启动审判程序。总统约瑟夫·奥恩此前一天强调，发布起诉决定是“不能再拖延的必要之举”，总理纳瓦夫·萨拉姆则承诺“不会包庇任何官员，无论其职位高低”。联合国黎巴嫩问题特别协调员让·阿尔诺同日指出，拖延正义即剥夺正义，必须推进司法程序以打破有罪不罚的循环。美国驻黎巴嫩大使馆亦发表声明，称寻求真相与正义是建设更强大、更稳定黎巴嫩的基础。
调查曾长期陷入停滞。据法新社报道，受伊朗支持的真主党曾发起运动要求撤换比塔尔，多起法律诉讼也试图将其排除在案件之外。但2023至2024年以色列与真主党之间的战争削弱了该组织，加之奥恩与萨拉姆于2025年初就职后承诺追究责任，比塔尔于去年恢复调查，针对其的多项法律障碍亦被解除。然而，部分遇难者家属和律师对调查范围表示担忧。据“有组织犯罪与腐败报道项目”援引律师泽娜·瓦基姆的话称，她担心出现“残缺的正义”，因为调查可能未触及硝酸铵的来源、入境方式及预定去向。另据黎巴嫩国家通讯社报道，一个代表部分遇难者家属的组织警告，任何不传唤所有相关责任人的起诉决定都将是“不完整的和政治性的”。
这起被路透社称为史上最大非核爆炸之一的事件，造成数十亿美元损失，并导致时任政府在六天后辞职。联合国协调员阿尔诺强调，公正、独立和透明的司法进程对于打破有罪不罚、恢复公众信任至关重要。美国大使馆亦将寻求真相与正义视为黎巴嫩国家建设的基石。目前，外界正等待公诉机关的意见，随后比塔尔将发布起诉决定，为审判铺路。案件的后续进展，将被视为检验黎巴嫩司法独立与政治意愿的关键指标。
| 阿拉伯黎凡特—马格里布媒体 | −0.70 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| 大西洋／英语圈媒体 | −0.50 | critical |
| 拉丁美洲媒体 | −0.40 | critical |
Lebanese national pain speaks through the voices of families, ministers, and artists, uniting mourning with a demand for justice against a system that has not yet punished the guilty.
It personalizes the tragedy through testimonies and official statements, transforming individual grief into a collective cause that legitimizes the demand for truth and punishment.
It does not mention the internal political divisions that have stalled the investigation, nor the role of external actors like Hezbollah or Syria, which could fragment the united front demanding justice.
The international observer records Lebanon's persistent impunity and the suffering of families, without taking sides but highlighting the absence of justice as a matter of fact.
It adopts a factual and detached register, citing figures and victims' statements, to build a narrative of institutional failure without assigning explicit blame.
It does not delve into the local political dynamics that have stalled the process, nor does it mention international pressures or the role of actors like the UN, keeping the focus on bare reporting.
The Latin American account presents the explosion as a natural event of great power, measuring its effects in terms of magnitude and economic damage, without emotional or political involvement.
It reduces the political and social complexity of the tragedy to scientific and numerical parameters, transforming a human catastrophe into a statistical data point.
It does not mention the victims as people, the families, the lack of justice, the Lebanese political context, or the protests, focusing exclusively on the physical aspects of the explosion.