Sign in
Edition of 06:00 CETMonday, August 3, 2026
320 outlets · 17 languages371 briefings today
Justice & LawFriday, June 26, 2026

California court upholds Weinstein rape conviction, orders resentencing as New York charge dropped

The appeals court affirmed the 2022 verdict but found the original sentence flawed; separately, Manhattan prosecutors withdrew a rape count after the accuser declined to testify again.

A California appeals court on Friday upheld Harvey Weinstein’s 2022 rape and sexual assault conviction, but ordered a resentencing, a day after prosecutors in New York dropped a separate rape charge against the former film producer because the accuser said she could not endure another trial. The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal leaves the core guilty verdicts intact while requiring the trial judge to recalculate the 16-year prison term. In Manhattan, the district attorney’s office formally dismissed a count of third-degree rape after Jessica Mann, a stylist and actor, submitted a statement saying the eight-year legal process had “caused more harm than benefit” and that she could no longer “bear to go through this.”

The California panel found that the trial judge did not violate Weinstein’s constitutional rights, rejecting defence arguments that the court had improperly limited cross-examination of the accuser, Evgeniya Chernyshova, about Facebook messages that the defence claimed would have shown a prior sexual relationship and undermined her credibility. The judges ruled that the excluded evidence fell under the state’s rape shield law and that Weinstein was still able to present his defence through other material. However, the panel agreed with the California attorney general that the original sentence could not stand because the sentencing judge had considered Weinstein’s New York convictions as an aggravating factor — convictions that were later overturned by New York’s highest court. Weinstein’s spokesperson, Juda Engelmayer, said the defence was “disappointed” and would seek review in the California Supreme Court, while acknowledging that “the court correctly recognized that his sentence cannot stand.”

In New York, the decision to withdraw the rape charge brought an end to a prosecution that had remained unresolved after Weinstein’s landmark 2020 conviction was overturned in 2024 and two subsequent retrials ended with hung juries on the count involving Mann. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg stated that his office believed Mann’s account and praised her “courage and extraordinary bravery,” but accepted that she could not testify a fourth time. Weinstein’s attorney, Jacob Kaplan, said outside court that the charges “should never have been brought from the beginning” and that Weinstein was relieved. The former producer, 74, remains convicted of a separate sexual felony in New York — the assault of former production assistant Miriam Haley — and is awaiting a September sentencing at which prosecutors are seeking a 20-year term.

The California conviction stems from the 2013 assault of Chernyshova, an Italian model and actor, at a Los Angeles film festival. Weinstein was sentenced to 16 years in prison, a term he would serve only after completing any New York sentence. The resentencing date in California has not been set, and Weinstein’s legal team has signalled it will petition the state Supreme Court for further review. The New York rape charge is now dismissed with prejudice, leaving the assault conviction as the active case in that jurisdiction. Weinstein remains in custody.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Pubblica sicurezza vs. Giustizia sociale
54%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.50 to +0.80
Atlantica sicurezzaLatinoamericana progressista
ATLLATSEA
Divergence between press blocs
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.50critical
Latin American press+0.80aligned
Southeast Asian press0.00neutral
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.50
Voice

The decision is an outrage to public safety: allowing a resentencing means betraying victims and weakening the system.

Mechanismgerarchia di minacce

A hierarchy is built where the threat to the collective overrides all other considerations, painting the resentencing as a social danger.

OutrageSkepticism
Latin American press+0.80
Voice

Weinstein's victory is a victory for all survivors; the court sent a strong and unequivocal message.

Mechanismuniversalizzazione

The victim's experience is universalized, turning a specific case into a global symbol of the fight against gender-based violence.

TriumphVictimhood
Southeast Asian press0.00
Voice

The court issued a technical decision, which will be followed by a new sentencing hearing.

Mechanismriproiezione

A detached and procedural tone is adopted, avoiding any moral judgment and projecting the case as a distant legal fact.

DetachmentPragmatism
Breaking
Blanche rescinds $1.8bn Trump fund after Senate Republicans block confirmation·Australia confirms first mass mortality of wild birds from H5N1 avian influenza·The 24-year-old clinical coordinator who works four side hustles to fund a medical dream·India finishes fourth in Glasgow as boxers deliver seven golds·Michelle Bolsonaro Senate Bid Confirmed as Health Crisis Prevents Unity Rally·Six dead in head-on collision between bus and camper on Italy’s SS79·Shiho Kuwaki wins Women's Open in dramatic playoff at Royal Lytham·In a Sundanese village, unwritten taboos guard a forest where shoes are forbidden·Blanche rescinds $1.8bn Trump fund after Senate Republicans block confirmation·Australia confirms first mass mortality of wild birds from H5N1 avian influenza·The 24-year-old clinical coordinator who works four side hustles to fund a medical dream·India finishes fourth in Glasgow as boxers deliver seven golds·Michelle Bolsonaro Senate Bid Confirmed as Health Crisis Prevents Unity Rally·Six dead in head-on collision between bus and camper on Italy’s SS79·Shiho Kuwaki wins Women's Open in dramatic playoff at Royal Lytham·In a Sundanese village, unwritten taboos guard a forest where shoes are forbidden·
Upd. 02:09 AM3 languages · 6 outlets
6 outlets|3 languages|3 min read
Friday, June 26, 2026

California court upholds Weinstein rape conviction, orders resentencing as New York charge dropped

The appeals court affirmed the 2022 verdict but found the original sentence flawed; separately, Manhattan prosecutors withdrew a rape count after the accuser declined to testify again.

A California appeals court on Friday upheld Harvey Weinstein’s 2022 rape and sexual assault conviction, but ordered a resentencing, a day after prosecutors in New York dropped a separate rape charge against the former film producer because the accuser said she could not endure another trial. The unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of California’s 2nd District Court of Appeal leaves the core guilty verdicts intact while requiring the trial judge to recalculate the 16-year prison term. In Manhattan, the district attorney’s office formally dismissed a count of third-degree rape after Jessica Mann, a stylist and actor, submitted a statement saying the eight-year legal process had “caused more harm than benefit” and that she could no longer “bear to go through this.”

The California panel found that the trial judge did not violate Weinstein’s constitutional rights, rejecting defence arguments that the court had improperly limited cross-examination of the accuser, Evgeniya Chernyshova, about Facebook messages that the defence claimed would have shown a prior sexual relationship and undermined her credibility. The judges ruled that the excluded evidence fell under the state’s rape shield law and that Weinstein was still able to present his defence through other material. However, the panel agreed with the California attorney general that the original sentence could not stand because the sentencing judge had considered Weinstein’s New York convictions as an aggravating factor — convictions that were later overturned by New York’s highest court. Weinstein’s spokesperson, Juda Engelmayer, said the defence was “disappointed” and would seek review in the California Supreme Court, while acknowledging that “the court correctly recognized that his sentence cannot stand.”

In New York, the decision to withdraw the rape charge brought an end to a prosecution that had remained unresolved after Weinstein’s landmark 2020 conviction was overturned in 2024 and two subsequent retrials ended with hung juries on the count involving Mann. Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg stated that his office believed Mann’s account and praised her “courage and extraordinary bravery,” but accepted that she could not testify a fourth time. Weinstein’s attorney, Jacob Kaplan, said outside court that the charges “should never have been brought from the beginning” and that Weinstein was relieved. The former producer, 74, remains convicted of a separate sexual felony in New York — the assault of former production assistant Miriam Haley — and is awaiting a September sentencing at which prosecutors are seeking a 20-year term.

The California conviction stems from the 2013 assault of Chernyshova, an Italian model and actor, at a Los Angeles film festival. Weinstein was sentenced to 16 years in prison, a term he would serve only after completing any New York sentence. The resentencing date in California has not been set, and Weinstein’s legal team has signalled it will petition the state Supreme Court for further review. The New York rape charge is now dismissed with prejudice, leaving the assault conviction as the active case in that jurisdiction. Weinstein remains in custody.

Divergence — who tells it how
Axis: Pubblica sicurezza vs. Giustizia sociale
54%Medium
3 blocs · positions from −0.50 to +0.80
Atlantica sicurezzaLatinoamericana progressista
ATLLATSEA
Divergence between press blocs
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.50critical
Latin American press+0.80aligned
Southeast Asian press0.00neutral
Atlantic / Anglosphere press−0.50
Voice

The decision is an outrage to public safety: allowing a resentencing means betraying victims and weakening the system.

Mechanismgerarchia di minacce

A hierarchy is built where the threat to the collective overrides all other considerations, painting the resentencing as a social danger.

OutrageSkepticism
Latin American press+0.80
Voice

Weinstein's victory is a victory for all survivors; the court sent a strong and unequivocal message.

Mechanismuniversalizzazione

The victim's experience is universalized, turning a specific case into a global symbol of the fight against gender-based violence.

TriumphVictimhood
Southeast Asian press0.00
Voice

The court issued a technical decision, which will be followed by a new sentencing hearing.

Mechanismriproiezione

A detached and procedural tone is adopted, avoiding any moral judgment and projecting the case as a distant legal fact.

DetachmentPragmatism

This story appeared in

6 outlets · 3 languages

Broaden your view

From Geopolitics & Politics

Trump Suspends Planned Iran Strikes, Citing Outline of Deal on Hormuz and Nuclear Programme

2 languages · 74 outlets

From Economy & Markets

Mexico’s economy rebounds 1.5% in Q2, its fastest quarterly expansion in more than five years

1 language · 18 outlets

From Technology

Chery Q EV launch at Indonesia auto show draws 6,000 orders with online-only sales model

1 language · 15 outlets

Read more