
Israeli Officials Say Trump Nears Decision on Large-Scale Strike Against Iran
Tensions reach a peak as Israeli security sources report the US president is closer than ever to ordering a wide attack, while Tehran warns of a decisive response and US embassies across the region issue urgent security alerts.
Israeli security officials assess that US President Donald Trump is closer than ever to ordering a large-scale military strike on Iran, with the situation described as being “on the verge of explosion.” Quoted by Israel’s Channel 12 and Channel 13, a senior Israeli official said the president views ongoing negotiations as “a waste of time” and is “angry, furious and frustrated.” The same sources indicate that while Trump has not yet decided on the scope of the attack or whether Israel would participate in an initial phase, the question is no longer “if” but “when.”
According to the Israeli official, the scenario presented to the White House envisages a targeted and limited strike on Iran’s energy infrastructure. Such an operation, the assessment holds, could destabilise the regime without triggering a global energy crisis, as it would focus on specific facilities with a significant psychological and social impact. The Israeli military has raised its alert level to the maximum, and security agencies are preparing for two possibilities: that Iran seizes the initiative and attacks Israel, or that Trump gives Israel a green light to join the offensive. The US has informed Israel that it will send dozens of additional refuelling aircraft to the country.
Viewed from Tehran, the warnings are unequivocal. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, in a phone call with his Saudi counterpart, said any “aggression” by the United States and Israel would be met with a “decisive and proportionate response.” The commander of Iran’s central operations headquarters, Ali Abdollahi, accused Washington of rapidly escalating tensions and warned that any country acting as a “defensive shield for criminal and aggressor America” would be engulfed by the fire of war. An adviser to the Supreme Leader separately cautioned against attacking Iranian infrastructure, writing that such a move would awaken “fault lines” built into the regional order.
In a parallel move, US embassies in Bahrain, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates issued security alerts on Saturday. The notices warned of “unexpected escalation” and advised American citizens to exercise extreme caution, prepare for possible flight cancellations and intermittent airspace closures, and consider departing the region. The embassy in Jerusalem specifically noted that the Iranian regime’s actions “cannot be predicted,” citing recent attacks on areas without prior warning, including Egypt. The current spike follows a resumption of hostilities on 7 July, after a ceasefire and a memorandum of understanding signed in June had paused a war that began with a US-Israeli attack on Iran on 28 February. Intensive talks between US and Israeli sides have been held over the past two days, but a final decision from the White House remains pending.
| Iranian & allied press | −0.60 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Russian & CIS press | 0.00 | neutral |
| Arab Gulf press | 0.00 | neutral |
Iran warns of an imminent US-Israeli aggression, portraying itself as a victim of unjustified provocation while signaling readiness for a decisive response.
By selectively citing Israeli sources that describe the situation as explosive and Trump as frustrated, the Iranian press constructs a narrative of inevitable attack, thereby justifying Iran's defensive posture and preemptively delegitimizing any US strike.
It omits Iran's own nuclear program and previous provocations that contribute to the tension, as well as the possibility that Iran might escalate first.
Moscow observes the rising tension between Washington and Tehran from a distance, reporting Israeli anxiety without endorsing either side.
By framing the news solely through Israeli official statements and describing the atmosphere as 'tense' without emotional language, the Russian press maintains a posture of impartial analysis, avoiding any commitment to a particular narrative.
It omits any mention of Iran's counter-threats or the detailed military options being considered, keeping the report focused on the Israeli perspective.
The Gulf states report the escalating crisis with a sense of urgency, highlighting both Israeli alerts and Iranian threats, while implicitly calling for restraint.
By presenting the Israeli 'explosive' warning alongside Iran's threat of decisive response, the Gulf press creates a balanced but urgent narrative that underscores the risk of regional spillover, thereby positioning itself as a concerned intermediary rather than a partisan actor.
It omits the specific details of the military plans and the internal US political dynamics that might influence Trump's decision, focusing instead on the immediate tension and regional implications.
Broaden your view
Mexico’s economy rebounds 1.5% in Q2, its fastest quarterly expansion in more than five years
1 language · 18 outlets
From TechnologyChery Q EV launch at Indonesia auto show draws 6,000 orders with online-only sales model
1 language · 15 outlets
From Science & HealthRewatching series offers stress relief, psychologists find
2 languages · 23 outlets