
Moscow Rejects Interim Ukraine Solutions, Demands US Honour Anchorage Proposals
Russian officials at the Primakov forum accused Washington of retreating from Alaska summit understandings, while Kyiv intensified strikes and G7 allies rallied behind Ukraine.
At the Primakov Readings forum in Moscow on 24 June, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov declared that Russia would not accept temporary ceasefire arrangements or ultimatums on Ukraine, and insisted that the only viable framework remained the “understandings” reached between Presidents Putin and Trump at the Anchorage summit in August 2025. Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov separately described Moscow’s readiness for dialogue as a consistent position, while praising US envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner for their willingness to listen to all sides.
According to Moscow’s account, the Anchorage meeting produced a US-authored proposal under which Ukraine would withdraw from the remainder of Donbas not under Russian control in exchange for a freeze of battle lines elsewhere. Lavrov said Putin had accepted the proposal as a compromise, but that Washington was now demanding further concessions while itself drifting away from the understandings. Viewed from Kyiv, any territorial concession remains a red line; President Zelenskyy used the G7 summit in Evian to argue that Ukraine was gaining momentum, and Ukrainian drone strikes on Russian infrastructure, including a Moscow refinery, have intensified. In European capitals, particularly Paris, the Anchorage framework is seen as having been overtaken by events; President Macron reportedly described it as “buried”.
The deadlock is compounded by the absence of a structured US-led diplomatic process. US envoys Witkoff and Kushner have been focused on finalising an Iran deal, and Moscow expects contacts to resume once they become available. Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov noted that the Trump administration increasingly links progress on bilateral tensions to a Ukraine settlement on Washington’s terms, a shift from the earlier approach. Russia has also offered to facilitate a long-term Iran-US agreement, signalling its interest in a broader diplomatic role. Meanwhile, the G7 summit produced a commitment to tighten sanctions on Russia’s war economy, and Trump stated that Russia “must make a deal”, departing from his earlier rhetoric of shared blame.
No date has been set for the next visit of Witkoff and Kushner to Moscow, though both sides acknowledge the need for continued contacts. Lavrov said Russia wants to hear directly from the US envoys what Washington took away from the Evian summit and how it sees the way forward. For now, the Kremlin maintains its public commitment to the Anchorage parameters while ruling out any interim freeze along the current front line, citing the failed Istanbul process of 2022. The diplomatic track remains open in principle, but the gap between Moscow’s insistence on prior understandings and Kyiv’s refusal to cede territory, reinforced by Western backing, leaves negotiations in a holding pattern.
| Russian & CIS press | +0.50 | aligned |
|---|---|---|
| Iranian & allied press | +0.30 | aligned |
| Israeli press | −0.50 | critical |
| Indian & South Asian press | 0.00 | neutral |
Russia reaffirms its own consistency and demands the same from the United States, positioning itself as the guarantor of bilateral agreements.
Through projection, Russia attributes to the United States its own claim of fidelity to the agreements, reversing the roles of accuser and accused.
Iran supports the Russian position as part of a common struggle against American unilateralism.
By universalizing the conflict, Iran turns a bilateral dispute into an episode of global resistance against US hegemony.
Israel aligns with the US security perspective and warns against Washington's ambiguities that could benefit Moscow.
Through a hierarchy of threats, Israel places the Russian demand in a regional security context, amplifying the risks to the Western order.
India observes the matter from a non-aligned perspective, without taking sides between the parties.
By adopting a pragmatic approach, India downplays the conflict's significance, presenting it as a normal diplomatic interaction.
Broaden your view
Mexico’s economy rebounds 1.5% in Q2, its fastest quarterly expansion in more than five years
1 language · 18 outlets
From TechnologyChery Q EV launch at Indonesia auto show draws 6,000 orders with online-only sales model
1 language · 15 outlets
From Science & HealthDRC Ebola outbreak surpasses 3,500 cases, becoming second largest on record
3 languages · 12 outlets