美伊战争五个月消耗“几乎全部”远程精确导弹，美军战备引发内部担忧
据路透社和CBS新闻援引知情人士报道，美国陆军战术导弹系统（ATACMS）和精确打击导弹（PrSM）库存已近枯竭，五角大楼否认影响作战能力。
据路透社、CBS新闻等多家媒体援引知情美国官员报道，在持续五个月的对伊朗军事行动中，美国已消耗“几乎全部”全球库存的陆军战术导弹系统（ATACMS）和精确打击导弹（PrSM）。这两种地对地远程精确弹药是美军从安全距离实施打击的关键手段，单价超过100万美元。报道称，库存数据已在联邦政府内部流传，引发国会和军方人士对美军未来应对其他危机能力的担忧。
白宫和五角大楼均否认弹药短缺影响战备。总统特朗普在一份声明中称，美国拥有“比世界上任何国家都多得多”的弹药，“远超我们所需”，并强调国防企业正以创纪录水平扩大生产。五角大楼首席发言人肖恩·帕内尔表示，美军是“世界上最强大的”，拥有执行总统所选任何行动所需的一切。国防部长皮特·赫格塞思此前也将库存担忧斥为“媒体编造的故事”。然而，路透社援引的四名知情人士中，三人对库存下降表示忧虑，认为这可能限制美军在未来潜在冲突中威慑对手的能力，包括俄罗斯和中国。
报道同时披露，除攻击性导弹外，防御性拦截弹的消耗同样严峻。战略与国际研究中心（CSIS）上月估算，战前美国拥有2330枚爱国者拦截弹，至7月底已降至759至827枚；萨德拦截弹则从452枚降至234至278枚。CSIS估计，两种拦截弹恢复至战前库存水平至少需要到2029年中。此外，自开战以来，美国还消耗了全球“战斧”巡航导弹库存的近一半。分析人士指出，高端弹药消耗速度远超工业补充能力，这一矛盾在长期高强度冲突中尤为突出。
远程精确打击弹药的急剧减少，可能迫使美军在特朗普若重启对伊朗大规模攻击时，更多依赖风险更高的有人驾驶轰炸任务。报道称，军方领导人已数周向总统警告防御性武器库存正在减少。目前，美国对伊朗的打击再次暂停，以便就霍尔木兹海峡问题进行外交努力，但特朗普仍威胁若美方条件未获满足将恢复大规模攻击。国会正持续施压政府，要求说明在不动摇应对其他地区危机能力的前提下，对伊朗的军事行动还能持续多久。弹药供应数据已成为特朗普政府内部围绕伊朗战争走向激烈辩论的焦点之一。
| 大西洋／英语圈媒体 | −0.30 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| 伊朗及相关媒体 | +0.80 | aligned |
| 中国媒体 | −0.20 | neutral |
| 拉丁美洲媒体 | −0.70 | critical |
America's arsenal has been drained by five months of war, and now the ability to respond to other global threats is compromised. National security sources warn that the Pentagon's reserves are 'dangerously low'.
It builds an implicit hierarchy of threats: the war with Iran has weakened deterrence against Russia and China, shifting focus from the immediate crisis to future strategic risks.
It omits mention of possible accelerated production capabilities or undisclosed reserves that could mitigate the shortage.
Iran has exposed the fragility of the American arsenal: after five months, the US is running out of missiles while Iranian resistance continues. This is proof that aggression fails.
It reverses the power narrative: instead of describing the shortage as an American logistical problem, it presents it as a strategic defeat inflicted by Iran, turning the other's weakness into its own victory.
It omits mention of Iran's own losses in the conflict and the fact that the war continues with intensity.
China notes that the American missile depletion reduces Washington's ability to intervene in Asia, confirming the wisdom of an independent defense strategy. Beijing does not comment directly but draws lessons for its own security.
It adopts a detached, analytical tone, presenting the news as a strategic fact from which to draw lessons for its own defense policy, without emotional alignment.
It omits mention of China's possible role as a supplier of technology or materials to either side, nor the implications for the global power balance.
US imperialism shows its true nature: a war machine that consumes itself while crushing peoples. The missile depletion is proof of the war's failure and the need to resist.
It uses strongly ideological language ('empire', 'imperialist', 'aggression') to frame the news as a moral condemnation of war, turning a logistical fact into a political judgment.
It omits mention of Iranian provocations that led to the conflict, nor the fact that other Latin American countries might have different positions.