US to expand social media vetting to foreign journalists and some Canadian, Mexican visa applicants
The State Department is reportedly widening online-presence checks to media visa seekers and certain business travellers under the USMCA, though officials have declined to confirm the internal memo.
The United States is preparing to require foreign journalists and certain nationals of Canada and Mexico to make their social media accounts public for review when applying for visas, according to an internal State Department memorandum obtained by the conservative outlet The Daily Signal. The report, published on Thursday, states that the existing vetting initiative – which already compels applicants for many visa categories, including students and exchange visitors, to open their online profiles – is being extended to representatives of foreign media and to workers entering under the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement, along with their dependents.
Both the White House and the State Department shared a link to the Daily Signal article on X, but the department declined to confirm the details, citing a policy of not commenting on “alleged internal documents.” A State Department spokesperson told AFP that what it calls “online presence vetting” is used to ensure applicants are eligible under US law and do not pose a threat to national security or public safety. The spokesperson added that consular officers employ multiple methods to make informed decisions, but did not specify when the new requirement would take effect.
Viewed from Washington, the move extends a pattern of immigration tightening that has marked Donald Trump’s second term since January 2025. The Department of Homeland Security last month hardened rules limiting how long foreign journalists and other visa holders, including students, may remain in the country; under a separate change that could be implemented as soon as September, journalists would be restricted to stays of 240 days, or roughly eight months, with the possibility of renewal. The State Department has also revoked visas of foreign nationals over online comments, including six individuals whose visas were cancelled in October 2025 for remarks related to the killing of a conservative activist.
The expansion has drawn criticism from non-governmental organisations that invoke privacy protections, and from civil liberties advocates who warn of a chilling effect on free expression. The administration has made online posts a factor in immigration decisions, with the US Citizenship and Immigration Services indicating it will review social media for content it deems antisemitic or “anti-American.” Secretary of State Marco Rubio has repeatedly stated that holding a visa is a privilege, not a right. For now, the reported policy remains unconfirmed in its details, and no implementation date has been announced.
| Iranian & allied press | −0.60 | critical |
|---|---|---|
| Latin American press | −0.20 | neutral |
| Sub-Saharan African press | 0.00 | neutral |
Iran denounces yet another violation of press freedom by the United States, which under the pretext of security imposes humiliating surveillance on foreign journalists.
The frame constructs the US as a hypocritical power that preaches freedom while systematically restricting it, using the specific case of journalists to symbolize a broader assault on civil liberties. By focusing on the requirement to make accounts public, it portrays the measure as an invasion of privacy rather than a security tool.
The Iranian frame omits that the policy also applies to Mexican and Canadian citizens, not just journalists, and does not mention any justification from the US side about security concerns. It also omits that the policy is part of a broader immigration crackdown that includes other categories.
Latin America watches with concern as the Trump administration tightens access to the United States, extending social media control to journalists and citizens of the region, in a measure that undermines privacy and press freedom.
The frame balances factual reporting with implicit criticism by including the perspective of privacy advocates and highlighting the impact on journalists and neighboring countries. It presents the policy as a further restriction rather than a security enhancement, using the phrase 'endurecimiento' (hardening) to frame it as part of a trend.
The Latin American frame omits the US government's stated security rationale in detail, and does not mention that the policy is based on an internal memo from the State Department. It also omits the specific requirement to change settings to public.
The United States is tightening visa screening by requiring foreign journalists and other applicants to make their social media accounts public, as reported by a conservative outlet and confirmed by the White House.
The frame relies on a neutral, reportorial tone that simply relays the information from the White House and the Daily Signal, without adding commentary or criticism. By attributing the story to a conservative outlet and the White House, it maintains distance and avoids taking a position.
The African frame omits any mention of criticism from privacy organizations, the impact on Mexican and Canadian citizens, and the broader context of Trump's immigration crackdown. It also does not mention the internal memo details beyond the requirement to set accounts to public.
Broaden your view
Oil majors post bumper Q2 profits as Iran conflict drives price surge
2 languages · 21 outlets
From TechnologyApple briefly removes Telegram from App Store over child abuse content
3 languages · 27 outlets
From Science & HealthUS FDA approves Moderna's first mRNA flu vaccine for adults 50 and older
3 languages · 11 outlets